The situation talked about in PLJ 1997 SC 985 included a declaration that respondents, being co-sharers, were being owners in the land. The match was initially dismissed, but on attractiveness, it absolutely was decreed in favor with the respondents. The issue of costs and jurisdiction performs a vital role in https://edgarppjoi.pointblog.net/getting-my-nuisance-and-land-use-wakeel-in-karachi-near-me-to-work-73423277